Bitcoins: Fueling Corruption In Ghana? | NsromaMedia

Bitcoins: Fueling Corruption In Ghana?

Bitcoins: Fueling Corruption In Ghana?

bitcoin crimeUntil very recently, the virtual currency known as bitcoins could be mistaken for just another Internet geek thing but when federal law enforcement closed the “Silk Road,” the wildly popular online illegal-drug emporium that used Bitcoin as a medium of exchange, politicians and policy makers took notice. Criminals, it turns out, really like bitcoins, which can be exchanged for nefarious purposes on the “Dark Web,” with complete anonymity and, it seems, impunity.

Suddenly bank transactions have gone down the drain and huge monies get missing but cant be traced to any property or paper trail in a country where fighting corruption seems to look like a huge task? Certainly I am concerned and so should you.

The shift to a virtual currency signals a huge and worrisome shift in behavior for criminals, who for decades have favored cold, hard cash, with the dollar the preferred medium of exchange. Just how alarmed we should be is one of the topics of a hearing today in the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Think about it. Until bitcoin became common legal tender among Ghanaain IT Geeks, it was always possible to find out any activity of our politicians, and much more easier to find out their illegal transactions by just hacking into their emails or finding bank statements or paper trails that lead to properties. Try, for a moment, to think like a criminal. Any financial transaction that leaves a trace also leaves evidence of your misdeeds. For that reason, cash has been king. For years, wrongdoers of every stripe, from hit men to drug dealers, had to tote around suitcases full of dollar bills to trade illegal goods and services.In the 1960s, though, narcotics traffickers selling drugs in U.S. cities faced daunting logistical challenges when it came to cash. Their merchandise was paid for in small bills. But how to get that money back to, say, a drug kingpin in Columbia? One option was to smuggle the cash in bulk, an approach that has become increasingly risky. Instead, gangs began to hire small-time couriers to gather up the revenue from local dealers and deposit it in local banks. Once deposited, this cash could readily be laundered via transfers to foreign accounts.

This flood of cash was welcomed by banks because it gave them reserves for profitable, low-risk loans. The banks turned a blind eye to the source of this wealth. They never questioned the propriety of fish stands or vegetables markets that were generating half a million dollars a day in cash, all in small-denomination bills. But over time this paper trails can be tracked down!

In 1970, Congress passed the Bank Secrecy Act, which attempted to make it impossible to launder money through the U.S. banking system. Under its terms, banks had to report cash transactions in excess of $10,000 via a Currency Transaction Report. Some banks complied with the regulations; others didn’t. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, federal law enforcement officials, the Internal Revenue Service and the Customs Service all created task forces to target money laundering of this sort. The first of these, “Operation Greenback,” led to the prosecution of both money launderers and banks for violations of the BSA. Other high-profile campaigns followed.

In what may or may not be a coincidence, the amount of dollars in circulation outside the U.S. exploded in the 1990s and early 2000s, from $86 billion in 1980, to $401 billion in 1999, to more than $500 billion today. Most of the increase can be attributed to the ever-growing demand for $100 bills. Economists have puzzled over why this is the case, but illicit economic activity likely played a role. The fact that the dollar is accepted the world over, and is readily converted into any number of other currencies, also makes it well-suited for international criminal activity.Even so, the old problems remained. They got worse after the Sept. 11 attacks, when growing scrutiny of international banking transactions made money laundering more perilous, and not only in the U.S. In the process, cash became the weak link in the international criminal economy. It was bulky, hard to hide, and suspicious: anyone with millions of dollars in cash on hand is automatically a suspect.


That’s where digital currencies come into play. In recent years, criminals started experimenting with online payment systems. The most successful of these was a Costa Rican payments processor called Liberty Reserve. It accepted deposits of “dirty” money, converted them into a digital currency (Liberty Reserve dollars) and then converted them back again into clean currencies. This online money laundering took place behind a veil of anonymity. It was eventually shut down, but not before it allegedly laundered $6 billion. One of its founders, Vladimir Kats, pleaded guilty to money laundering and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business on Oct. 31.

Unlike Liberty Reserve, Bitcoin’s transactions aren’t truly invisible. Thanks to the elaborate software architecture that stands behind this “cryptocurrency,” it’s possible to see the web of exchanges involving Bitcoin. But it’s not possible to see who is using them, much less what they’re buying. Little wonder that bitcoins have a growing criminal constituency, particularly in the unregulated, murky online world of the “Deep Web.”

And given the speed with which bitcoins entered illicit commerce, it looks likely that drug traffickers and other international criminals will ditch old-fashioned cash for digital currencies. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. When it comes to moving ill-gotten gains, hitting a few keys on a laptop beats shipping bogus toaster stuffed with cash.

 Assuming a government official or any business man could just make a business transaction without paper works or back transactions, imagine how unsafe the economy and financial state is going to be to the detriment of the country. So the big question is is Ghana ready to embrace Bitcoin? Does Ghana even have the cyber space to control what kind of electronic traffic is coming in? Should Ghanaians be concerned or are we going to brush this over in the good old fashion like we usually do?
Only time will tell.

Tags assigned to this article:

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can be first to comment this post!

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*